# of watchers: 24
2008-12-07 [iN lOvE]: awesome :)
2010-08-07 [FireFighter]: i want an River Otter. Anyway i can get one?
2011-07-30 [Bookwyrm]: PAGE REDONE. /pant
2011-10-14 [Bookwyrm]: Still working on the rewrite.
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Updated. Some things will have to be updated/fixed later, but for the most part I think it's good. Any opinions? :P
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: It looks awesome.
Maybe a token to have the little default blurb of text in your treasury slot changed? Kind of like how [kittykittykitty], yourself and I all have special text in our slots.
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: That's an awesome idea.
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: W00t. :3
Although, that should have some word-limit on it, or we'll end up with members' requesting a paragraph there. x)
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Yes, of course. :D
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: xD
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: You could probably also make a small tog-fee (say like 3?), that lets you choose any normal pet from the store as a pet, instead of waiting for it to be stocked.
Or you could make it so very few pets are stocked, and make it so pets'll be more "elite" and thus people'd be more likely to spend some togs to get them. xP
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Also a good plan in theory. I'll ponder on that a bit. :D
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Does the special blurb token sound all right? Twenty words doesn't seem like much, but mine is 14 as it is without my pet's names and species included. Maybe I should make it 25? I don't want to make it too much or too little.
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: It sounds good to me. 20 is a good amount. Maybe if someone had like, 5 pets an exception could be made for a longer blurb, but I don't see any reason past that really.
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Yeah more pets should give a longer blurb. Might add something bout that later.
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: :D
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: I changed the limit to fifteen for a single pet, with an additional five words per pet for a total of thirty-five if you have the max of five pets. That sound good?
2011-10-22 [Stephen]: Yeah, it sounds good to me. *nod*
I added "S"'s, so it goes in line with the plurals above. :3
2011-10-22 [Bookwyrm]: Thank you. >.<
Also, should I move all that to the Help page?
2011-10-23 [Stephen]: Hm, that's hard to say. It's technically part of both. I think it's OK here, and how you mentioned them on the help page. :)
2011-10-23 [Bookwyrm]: Cool, I hoped that would be functional.